Age Discrimination
HRM Guide Updates
Search all of HRM Guide


HRM Guide publishes articles and news releases about HR surveys, employment law, human resource research, HR books and careers that bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Office Supplies - 15% off first order

 

Age discrimination still rife

October 25 2005 - A survey of 2682 managers and HR professionals has shown that age discrimination is still commonplace.

The survey, conducted by the Chartered Management Institute and the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, found that 59% of respondents said that they had been personally disadvantaged at work because of their age. 22% admitted that age has an impact on their own recruitment decisions.

The survey also found that nearly half (48%) had suffered age discrimination when applying for jobs and 39% believe their chances of promotion had been afffected by age discrimination. 63% of respondents believed that employees aged 30-39 years had the best promotion prospects. Just 2% cited 50 year-olds or above.

80% were hoping to retire by the age of 65, despite believing that the age of retirement for the average person in 10 years' time will be 66 or older. But 29% of organisations have already scrapped mandatory retirement ages.

Dianah Worman, Diversity Adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) said, "Our research shows that most managers expect everyone to be retiring later within ten years - except themselves. There is a growing acceptance that the average worker is going to stay at work beyond 65. But no-one seems to think it applies to them. It is good news that attitudes to older workers are changing, but individuals need take a reality check on their expectations of their own retirement age.

"The evidence also suggests that the current proposal to set a default retirement age of 65 is a useless bureaucratic barrier, which needs to be either finessed or scrapped. If the objective of the legislation is to end age discrimination in the workplace and support older workers, this is likely to be counterproductive. The Government would do far better to focus their attention on extending flexible working arrangements to ensure that employers are able to make greater use of the skills and experience offered by older workers."

According to Petra Cook, Head of Public Affairs at the Chartered Management Institute, "Looking at the changing demographics, approximately 80 per cent of the workforce is already in employment. As such, organisations will need to focus on upskilling and reskilling their current workforce. This is reflected by the finding that the need to retain skills is the key driver of retirement policy. It also means that individuals must now plan their careers in a new light. The days of a single, linear career are over and employees must take some responsibility for creating new opportunities and challenges in their later working lives. But, in order for this to happen, organisations will have to adapt to ensure that older workers are treated as an asset and offered flexibility."

The perception of how old is an 'older worker' has changed. Ten years ago, respondents cited 48 as the mean age for a female 'older employee' compared with 55 now. But the perception remains that women get 'older' at a younger age. The mean age for an 'older' male employee was given as 57 in the recent survey, compared with 51 a decade ago.


HRM Guide Updates

Search all of HRM Guide


 
  Contact  HRM Guide Network
Copyright © 1997-2006 Alan Price and HRM Guide Network contributors. All rights reserved.