|
HRM Guide publishes articles and news releases about HR surveys, employment law, human resource research, HR books and careers that bridge the gap between theory and practice. |
![]()
Custom Search
|
|
AnswersHuman resources are just the same as any other business resource - No Storey described HRM as an 'amalgam of description, prescription and logical deduction' - Yes Hard and soft mean difficult and easy to understand respectively - No Personnel Management has more of a welfare than a managerialist tradition in some countries - Yes HRM is just a new name for Personnel Management wherever it is applied - No There is greater stress on differences between HRM and Personnel Management outside the USA - Yes Legge said that most accounts of personnel management are normative rather than descriptive - No Pfeffer and Ulrich have encouraged the 'best practice' approach to HRM - Yes Harvard's model of HRM was much harder than that from Michigan - No The Harvard model stands in the tradition of 'human relations' - Yes The Harvard map shows the countries where HRM is most used - No The 'four Cs' of the Harvard model are: consistency, conflict, caring and constancy - No The Michigan model is also known as the 'matching model' of HRM - Yes Human Resource Management is portrayed as a systematic approach to people management - Yes The fundamental concepts of HRM are generally agreed and easy to implement - No There is a coherent and integrated system of HR certification in the USA - No Stakeholder theory contrasts with the stockholder model - Yes Stakeholder theory has its origins in HRM - No The rise and application of HRM has been faster in theory than in practice - Yes Senior managers tend to view HRM as strategic - Yes
|
|
HRM Guide makes minimal use of cookies, including some placed to facilitate features such as Google Search. By continuing to use the site you are agreeing to the use of cookies. Learn more here
![]() |
|
![]() |
Privacy Policy |
|