IN THE NEWS THIS WEEK:
* INCREASE IN TRIBUNAL AWARDS & REDUNDANCY PAY
* NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGE
* HUGE INCREASE IN TRIBUNAL CLAIMS
* 'GROPING' BOSS MADE LEWD REMARKS
INCREASE IN TRIBUNAL AWARDS & REDUNDANCY PAY
Increases have been confirmed to the maximum compensatory award for unfair
dismissal and to statutory redundancy pay, which will take effect from 1st
February 2001, the most significant of which are:
* 'A maximum weeks pay' for calculation of the basic award in unfair
dismissal cases and statutory redundancy pay increases from £230 to £240
* Maximum compensation for unfair dismissal increases from £50,000 to
£51,700
* The limit on the amount of guarantee payment payable to an employee
in respect of a workless day has increased from £16.10 to £16.70
See http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/stat.htm
for details.
NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGE
On 4th January 2001, new figures were published by the government showing
that enforcement officers have recovered more than £3m for the low paid.
Between April 1999 and April 2000, government figures show that average
earnings rose by:
* 4.7% in the north east of England to £365.80 per week;
* 4% in Wales to £368.10 per week;
* 3.8% in the south west of England to £379.10 per week;
* 3.7% in Yorkshire and the Humber region to £373.70 per week.
Latest figures show that:
* enforcement officers have won back £3.1m for low paid workers who
were not being paid the minimum wage;
* the NMW helpline has taken over 225,000 calls since it opened;
* there have been over 6,000 complaints of underpayment and nearly
8,000 employers have been visited by enforcement officers;
* 290 enforcement notices have been issued;
* 42 penalty notices have been issued.
HUGE INCREASE IN TRIBUNAL CLAIMS
* Recent research has shown that the number of Employment Tribunal
claims brought by employees has increased by over a third since 1997. The
actual number of cases has increased from 86,812 in 1997 to 118,400 in
2000, an increase of 36%.
'GROPING' BOSS MADE LEWD REMARKS
An Employment Tribunal has heard a woman accuse her former boss of making
lewd comments about the size of her breasts and her 'visible panty line',
this week. The Company defended the claim on the basis that the comments
were "office banter".
The Employment Tribunal decision is awaited, but this case follows a
string of sex discrimination/harassment cases where financial awards to
the employees' have been high.
This case highlights further the importance of employers considering the
implementation of a harassment policy to deal with these kind of
allegations at an early stage. In many cases this will prevent such
action leading to an Employment Tribunal claim.
In the recent case of Driskel-v-Peninsula Business Services Limited &
Others (2000), the Appeal Tribunal decided that office banter can be
discriminatory, even if it is directed at both sexes. Here the Appeal
Tribunal found that the banter was intimidatory, and therefore
discriminatory against women.
It is important also to remember that sexual harassment is defined in the
terms of 'unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, or other conduct based on
sex affecting the dignity of women and men at work. This can include
unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct'.
WE CAN HELP YOU:
Please use the buttons above if you:
* Want to receive more information/advice on any of the matters in
this edition (please give details of which matter you require advice on).
* Want further details of our forthcoming seminars.
* Want us to revise your current policies or procedures or provide a
quote.
* Want advice on any employment matters.
If you would like further information about this or anything else please e-mail
lonemp@steeleslaw.co.uk or visit our web site www.steeleslaw.co.uk
This article copyright © 2001 Steeles Law.
All rights reserved.